Born-Haber cycles are simply a fancy Hess cycle transposed onto an energy level diagram and we can use them to calculate the lattice energy for an ionic compound.
They might seem a little complicated when you first meet them but if you employ your logic skills, you will have them mastered in no time at all.
Practice questions
- Draw a Born-Haber cycle for potassium bromide and use it to calculate the lattice energy, ΔLEH⦵, for the process KBr(s)  ⇾ K+(g)  +  Br–(g)  .
ΔatH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | ΔIEH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | ΔEAH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | ΔfH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | |
Potassium | +89 | +420 | – | – |
Bromine | +112 | – | -342 | – |
Potassium bromide | – | – | – | -392 |
2. Draw a Born-Haber cycle for sodium hydride and use it to calculate the first electron affinity for hydrogen.
ΔatH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | ΔIEH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | ΔfH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | ΔLEH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | |
Sodium | +108 | +500 | – | – |
Hydrogen | +218 | – | – | – |
Sodium hydride | – | – | -57 | +811 |
3. Draw a Born-Haber cycle for barium chloride and use it to calculate the enthalpy of lattice formation for the compound.Â
ΔatH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | 1st ΔIEH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | 2nd ΔIEH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | ΔEAH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | ΔfH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | |
Barium | +175 | +500 | +1000 | – | – |
Chlorine | +112 | – | – | -364 | – |
Barium chloride | – | – | – | – | -860 |
4. Complete a Born-Haber cycle for strontium oxide using the template below, and use it to calculate the 2nd electron affinity for oxygen.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd993/cd993d741b96de5307c8e363e9fc951ff35d2e1d" alt=""
ΔatH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | 1st ΔIEH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | 2nd ΔIEH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | 1st ΔEAH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | ΔfH⦵ / kJ mol-1 | ΔLEH⦵ /kJ mol-1 | |
Strontium | +164 | +500 | +1100 | – | – | – |
Oxygen | +249 | – | – | -141 | – | – |
Strontium oxide | – | – | – | – | -590 | +3303 |
5. (a) Define the term ‘enthalpy of lattice formation’ and write an equation to represent the enthalpy of lattice formation of silver iodide.
(b) The lattice formation energy for silver iodide is -869 kJ mol-1 which is determined using experimental data. A calculation for the same term based on a perfect ionic lattice model gives a less exothermic value. Explain this difference.
Answers
1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ba75/4ba75caf0f817bb51e5293d16887b3d9dd150a7c" alt=""
2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8605b/8605b387242c62e1ded84617c377680abca9523a" alt=""
3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7a92/b7a92f371204938e2c9414ceca7dd4847a000cba" alt=""
4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf24e/bf24e376da759bd966083305888aca45bbbb08bc" alt=""
5. (a) Â This is the enthalpy change when one mole of a solid ionic compound / ionic lattice is formed from its gaseous ions.Â
Ag+(g)  +  I–(g)  ⇾  AgI(s)
    (b)  The experimental value is more exothermic indicating that in reality the bonds in silver iodide are stronger than the model predicts , which is due to significant covalent character in the bonding.Â